We choose to do what we do. Or do we? The issue of free will is a bread and butter one for philosophers. We’ve been arguing for thousands of years about this sort of thing. Some argue that we are free to choose as we wish. Others say we are not. To some, our actions are determined by an all powerful supreme being. Calvinists, for example, believe that all of our actions are pre-determined by the divine. Today, there are those that suggest that the brain is merely a matter of electrical impulses, that our actions are determined by biology. And still, most believe that we choose to do what we do.
The real payoff here lies in the notion of moral responsibility. We don’t blame people for doing things where they have no choice. If your friend gets pushed by a bully and bangs into you, do you blame your friend for the accident? Your friend will rightly say, “It is not my fault. I did not mean to do that.” We don’t blame people, or even praise them, for doing things that they do not do voluntarily.
There is one part of voluntary action that has always intrigued me—namely, non-voluntary action. I’ve always been interested in the situation where one is coerced, or forced to choose to do something. In this section of the Nichomachean Ethics, Aristotle sets out the first understanding of coercion and moral responsibility.
Read the chapter on Voluntary Action from the Nichomachean Ethics.
There are two steps to this assignment:
Write a 3- to 5-page paper and upload it by the end of this module.
Humanities
Safe and secure online platform that matches students in need of academic assistance with subject-matter experts
Our service is used for research, consulting, and inspirational purposes only! Papers received from us are NOT meant for submission! Never hand in papers received from our company!
© 2023 All rights reserved.
WhatsApp us